Why do people still believe second hand smoke - smokers will kill them?

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/…


“Conclusions The results do not support a causal relation between environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality, although they do not rule out a small effect. The association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and coronary heart disease and lung cancer may be considerably weaker than generally believed.”





http://www.cigarmony.com/downloads/smoki…


“Conclusions: Our results indicate no association between childhood exposure to ETS and lung cancer risk. We did find weak evidence of a dose–response relationship between risk of lung cancer and exposure to spousal and workplace ETS. There was no detectable risk after cessation


of exposure.[JNatlCancerInst1998;90:1440–50…





http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/…


“No significant associations were found for current or former exposure to environmental tobacco smoke before or after adjusting for seven confounders and before or after excluding participants with pre-existing disease. No significant associations were found during the shorter follow up periods of 1960-5, 1966-72, 1973-85, and 1973-98.”





Showtime television, "How the EPA, CDC, Lung Association, and etc." support their claims.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGApkbcaZ…





A CDC S.H.S. research employee offers $100 to any campaign willing to tell the truth.


http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2006…





Yet most continue to believe the lies right in the face of scientific reports. Why is that? Are just prejudice and refuse to believe something proven to them?|||because everybody who smokes is slowly committing suicide...