Was Jesus a Female..?

If Jesus came from a woman who never had sex,


wouldn't he have all of her chromosomes and be born as a female?





Many Christians say God is outside of space and time, so He can have no causal effect on the universe, rendering His paternal claim to Jesus a worthless analogy. So with no possible paternal lineage, Jesus could not have had any male genetic material.


He MUST have been female.|||god's female son|||perhaps this will be helpful. you are the maker of a video game, you make the rules. also you know all the loopholes and secrets because you created it. therefore God can defy the laws for he made them in creation.


on top of that we as humans cannot figure everything out; it's impossible. the universe is so vast and unusual that there's accounts where it goes against the laws that it came with.|||I'm okay with Jesus being a female. It doesn't bother me if Jesus was a female. I'm going to be frank when I say, I've never looked down his holy robe, so I really don't know. I think Jesus was asexual, either man or woman, but I have no problem believing either.|||Jesus had a vagina?! :O Nah just kidding...


Constructive question my friend, i'd say that Jesus was a very cool smooth guy, specially with the ladies ;) So, definitely not a female. That's just my opinion. :)|||oh yeah, Using science to explain religion, that makes almost as much sense as using politicians to control spending.





But if you want to go that route: You don't have to have sex to be a surrogate mother.|||you added no causal effect


christians dont say that nor is your proposition based on logic , that because he exists outside time and space he can have no effect|||no, he wouldn't be a female because he "became incarnate of the virgin mary". This holy incarnation has nothing to do with normal reproduction|||Oh, no God didn't think of that.





Maybe he didn't have the power to cause Him to be a man.





Oh nevermind....he invented all of it and it only works as he directs.|||Aha, you're right! Asexual reproduction leads to a clone of the parent. He's gotta get that Y chromosome from someone that's not his mama :)





- Joanna Eve|||Of course not- Jesus is explictedly mentioned as God's son. Now, assuming that they mistake the word 'son' for 'daughter', how would you explain his Jesus-beard?|||*Sexist comment from Christians in 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.*|||Women only contribute one X chromosome to their children. Going by that theory, Jesus would be neither male nor female.|||...which would mean Mary would have been the only human capable of asexual reproduction.|||Ummm ......





jesusophobic|||a woman would never have been allowed in the inner temple to worship.|||his alter ego was called jessica.|||HELLO! The Son Of God, people!|||NO|||no and she did have sex with Joseph after the birth...His brother was James..|||Why those slutty Apostles. You think they got tired of the sheep?|||i dont gave a ****.|||yes jesus was a clone of mary








i once got a violation for asking this|||jesus was a nasty slut|||Don't you think Matthew, Mark, John, and Peter, those people who LIVED with Jesus, would have said something about his lack of a penis, or the presence of breasts, on a 33 year old woman? What about "her" need to be secluded once a month? What did the priedt do when Jesus was presented to be circumcised on the eighth day after his birth? Would big strong Jewish men in the first century have followed a WOMAN???





Wouldn't ALL of this have been apparent when Jesus was stripped and mocked? Wouldn't they public have SEEN the bare breasts on the naked Jesus? Wouldn't the soldiers have remarked about the ease by which the hair of his beard was pulled out by the roots when they beat him? Why was Jesus beaten, and not raped? The Unbelievers say that a Roman soldier was supposed to have raped Jesus' mother, instead of God causing the pregnancy. Why not rape Jesus, too?





Wouldn't all of this OBVIOUS evidence has stopped Christainity dead in it's tracks at that point? Why do we still HAVE Christianity, why did Rome itself become a Christian nation, when the Roman rulers could simply have said, "You are following a WOMAN, you idiots!"





Your reasoning is faulty to the point of stupidity, based on a lack of knowledge. ALL the evidence you need is clearly stated in the bible, and NEVER refuted by an sources outside the bible. Why doesn't Greek or Roman history claim Jesus was a woman, thus proving Christianity false?





BECAUSE HE WASN'T!!! JESUS WAS MALE.





SURELY, a God who can make a man from dust (abiogenesis) can manipulate DNA such that the female baby expected from parthenogenesis (as you allude to) is actually a male.





What part of "OMNIPOTENT GOD" don't you understand?